Archive for the 'Ramblings' Category

Living Forever

Ramblings, Philosophy, Polls 3 Comments »

Living Forever is the subject of the current poll, on the right side of this page.

In 1900, the life expectancy for newborn babies in the United States was 46 for males and 48 for females. By the year 2000, life expectancy had increased by an average of 64% to 74 for males and 80 for females. Even a modest increase at half that rate over the next century would put average natural life expectancy above 100 years of age. If our civilization continues at the current rate, it will be over 125 years by the year 2100.

With the exponential growth of scientific advancement over the last half century, we might even expect an increase in that rate. Some scientists are saying that the first person that will live to see 200 is alive today. Some are saying we’re on the brink of flat out reversing the aging process. Crazier ones are purporting that the scientific discoveries and possibilities offered by gene/DNA manipulation will allow us to live as long as we want.

But what kind of social consequences does that have, if we just won’t die? How long would you want to live? 200 years? 500 years? 1000 years?

If you think our current life expectancy is ‘just right’, then what do you think the people alive in 1900 thought? What age will the first generation of the 22nd century think is ‘just right’?

Tagging Crap

Ramblings 2 Comments »

I took a week off, and I get tagged. So, it happened. CHADMAC has tagged me with the eight random facts thing. This is how it works - I post the following rules and then post some random little facts about myself. First, the rules:

  • We have to post these rules before we give you the facts.
  • Players start with eight random facts/habits about themselves.
  • People who are tagged need to write their own blog about their eight things and post these rules.
  • At the end of your blog post, you need to choose eight people to get tagged and list their names.
  • Don’t forget to leave them each a comment telling them they’re tagged, and to read your blog.

Second, the facts:

  1. I hate tagging memes with a passion because they seem to be a severe waste of time and (save any ulterior pageranking or link-whoring motives) only serve as fodder for someone who has nothing else to post about at the moment.
  2. I have nothing else to post about at the moment.
  3. I am God. Don’t believe me? Check out my email address: god@ccannizzaro.com.
  4. Speaking of being God, I’m a control freak. I’m not a backseat driver, and I’m not one to get agitated and irritable, but it will burn on the inside if I see someone doing something that I know can be done in a better, faster, or more efficient way.
  5. This blog is an experiment, meant only to serve my curiosity and love of learning. My blog has a finite lifespan, and, as God, only I know when it is predestined to end. At that point, all your links to my blog will lead to one of two places: 1) to nowhere (fitting for an athiestic site) or 2) to rather unattractive or uninteresting pictures of me and my family, friends, and dog.
  6. Speaking of my dog, his name is Darwin, but not for the religio-scientific Charles-inspired reasons that most people assume. We actually chose it because of its intrinsic meaning, which is “good friend, dear friend, or friend”. We thought it a fitting name for our dog.
  7. I’m weird and obsessive compulsive sometimes. I consciously avoid stepping on cracks on the sidewalk, but just the natural unplanned cracks, the seams that are supposed to be there don’t bother me. Not for any superstitious reasons, just because I don’t like to. I also flush the toilet in a public restroom with my foot, including the urinal, where I am forced to use my flying dragon ninja kick. I also have the highest possible frequent flyer status on two different airlines, I’ve flown hundreds of thousands of miles, and still have never seen the inside of an airplane bathroom. And if I have my way, I never will.
  8. I have arachnophobia. I know… how can God be afraid of spiders? but it’s true. As you know, I’ve never claimed to be a rational or reasonable entity.

Bonus fact: I’m not much for following the rules. I have a general disdain for authority, especially undeserved authority. And I typically learn the hierarchy of an organization or system only so I know how to subvert it when necessary.

So I’m not tagging anyone with this meme. The buck, as they (yes, that they) say, stops here.

Thank You Jesus!

Ramblings, Religion, General Idiocy, Humor, Logic 5 Comments »

It’s about time! Finally, someone has offered to help the seriously afflicted, like Jackie Chan, and Margaret Cho, and maybe part of Soledad O’Brien (who knows? I mean, really).

Asian?

Thankya Jeeesus!

“Curing” Ted Haggard in three weeks, instead of the usual 4.5 years, has emboldened Christians, and they now have the balls to think they can counsel the genetics right out of you. I can’t wait to see the first success story!

Actually, to be honest, the billboard above was probably changed to illustrate the fact that homosexuals don’t choose to be gay any more than Asians choose to be Asian. Both people who read this blog are already aware of that fact, so I’ll refrain from pulling out the multiple sources that show it’s a natural ‘phenomenon’. That’s a moot point anyway.

What really needs to be done is to get people to stop thinking solely in terms of sexual activity when it comes to homosexuality, as if that’s all that matters in a homosexual relationship. A lot of people, especially those that have a problem with it, think of it as a kind of hedonistic orgy of rebellion and sexual hegemony, but never bother to consider any other kinds of attraction that two people can have between each other. Their problem with homosexuality isn’t that two people are emotionally, psychologically, and physically attracted to or in love with each other. Their problem is that they act on it, like any heterosexual couple would, by having sex.

In other words, it’s okay for two men (or women) to love each other, as long as they don’t have sex (or get “married” in the eyes of the state). Sure they’ll find a euphemism for their motive, like “traditional family values”, but to those that have a problem with it, it’s all about the sex. And as long as that is allowed to continue, homosexuality will be brushed off, subjugated, and easily classified as less genuine than heterosexual relationships. And people like those in the Truth Ministry will continue to think it’s something to be cured.

I Have No Words

Ramblings, Politics, General Idiocy, War, Polls 4 Comments »

:what:

Cannot… compute… head… hurts…

Iraq Question

This is one of many questions from a survey by Newsweek, conducted June 18-19, 2007. Yes, 2007! The people who answered this question are over 18, and part of the voting public.

Yes, that’s a warning.

Not only are 41% of people completely ignorant, but that’s up 5% since 2004.

The Summer Solstice

Ramblings, Religion 4 Comments »

If my South African and Tierra Del Fuego-an readers will excuse me for a moment, it’s June 21st, the Summer Solstice. It’s the beginning of summer in the Northern hemisphere, because, well… The Earth begins tilting back in the other direction today (at least in relation to the Sun). Rumor has it that it actually happened at 6:06pm GMT, which is about the time this was posted.

Stonehenge

Today is a religious holiday (Litha or Midsummer) for modern Pagans. No doubt many of them gathered at Stonehenge in Wiltshire, England this morning to watch the sunrise in alignment with its axis. Much to their delight, I’m sure, this is one of the few Pagan holidays that Christians have yet to commandeer, re-brand, and re-package for consumption by the masses. That is, unless you count the feast day of St. John the Baptist on June 24, in which case the Christians did a particularly poor job of re-branding when you compare it to the monumental success of Christmas. But then again, that is Jesus’ day.

But Pagans aren’t the only ones to hold this day in high regard. Native American tribes had many celebrations, and harvests, and feasts related to this day.

Probably the most famous Native American homage to the Summer Solstice is The Bighorn Medicine Wheel near Sheridan, Wyoming in the Rocky Mountains. It’s one of many wheels, most of which are located in Canada. At Bighorn, the center of a small cairn (which is external to the main wheel) lines up with the center of the wheel and the sunrise. It really has little to do with Medicine though. The term “medicine wheel” was invented by Pilgrims. “Medicine” was a term used to describe anything native that white people didn’t understand.

Ancient Romans were also fond of this day. The festival of Vestalia was held in honor of the Roman Goddess of hearth, Vesta, and it lasted from June 7th to June 15th. During this time, married women were allowed to enter the shrine of Vesta, whereas during the rest of the year only the vestal virgins were permitted inside.

Not to be left out, Ancient China had their own Summer Solstice ceremony, during which they celebrated the Earth, the feminine, and the yin forces. This complemented the Winter Solstice which celebrated the heavens, the masculine, and the yang forces.

So don’t discriminate, pick your favorite, and go out and celebrate today! And if you don’t like all this religious and mythological mumbo jumbo, that’s okay… it’s also World Humanist Day! See? Something for everyone.

Hell: Floor 2, Please!

Ramblings, Atheism, Humor, Hell 2 Comments »

I’m not much for tests, and quizzes, and other internet meme. But I saw Dante’s Inferno Test at Mike’s Weekly Skeptic Rant, and I just couldn’t resist.

Apparently, my lack of remorse for doing the things I want to do is earning me a ticket to the second level of hell. Who knew? :shrug:

Or perhaps it was that weekend at the zoo, hhmmmm.

The wretched King Minos has decided your fate. His tale wraps around his body 2 times.
The sweet light no longer strikes against your eyes. Your shade has been banished to… the Second Level of Hell!

The Dante’s Inferno Test has banished you to the Second Level of Hell!
Here is how you matched up against all the levels:

Level Score
Purgatory (Repenting Believers) Very Low
Level 1 - Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers) Very Low
Level 2 (Lustful) Extreme
Level 3 (Gluttonous) Moderate
Level 4 (Prodigal and Avaricious) Moderate
Level 5 (Wrathful and Gloomy) High
Level 6 - The City of Dis (Heretics) Very High
Level 7 (Violent) High
Level 8- the Malebolge (Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers) High
Level 9 - Cocytus (Treacherous) High

Take the Dante’s Inferno Hell Test

Atheists Respond

Ramblings, Atheism, General Idiocy, Humor 4 Comments »

Ever since Ray Comfort of Kirk Cameron so eloquently argued for the seemingly perfect design of the banana, Atheists have been running around like mad trying to explain away the purported divine inspiration. Ray and Kirk dubbed the banana “The Atheist’s Nightmare”, and indeed it seems they were right.

Atheists scrambled for a response, like neo-cons looking for a war, and offered crazy claims about humans cultivating the banana over thousands of years. As if that wasn’t, itself, part of God’s plans. pssshh. Crazy Atheists!

Still they pressed on, and the banana continued to haunt them as they attacked the intelligence of Mr. Comfort and Sir Cameron. They even likened them to the primates that feast on the banana. Ah, the last gasp of the dying argument, ad hominem attacks.

The Atheists were stuck. They were cornered, with nowhere to turn…

until one evil Atheist grocer found a way.

Atheists respond, ironically, with one of their oldest and most basic tactics - denying the banana ever existed:

Curved Fruit

Hark! Those clever bastards! They had nearly been snuffed out by their nightmares of bananas, but it seems they live to fight another day.

You win this round Atheists… you win this round. :squint:

To Ban or Not to Ban

Ramblings, Politics, Media, General Idiocy No Comments »

To ban or not to ban, that is the question… that is being asked about rolling sneakers.

I was browsing around the news sites yesterday when I came across the following bit on the front page of msnbc.com:

Heelys

What caught my eye was the second headline, “Rolling sneakers blamed for injuries hike”. But not so much for the headline itself, as what immediately followed, “Ban ‘em?” As if that should be our first reaction when we find that the kids who wear these sneakers with hidden wheels, called “Heelys”, are getting injured because of their inability to heed the warnings that are issued with every purchase.

You can read the actual story here.

The link to for the “Ban ‘em?” question leads to a survey that asks, “Should rolling sneakers be banned?” And what I always hate about these questions is that they fail to specify who, exactly, is doing the banning.

Heely Shoes

Are we talking about schools, or malls, or other high traffic establishments banning their use to protect fellow pedestrians? Or are we talking about a complete outright ban of the shoes, in the form of a law or an ordinance, in order to protect the would-be roller?

In the case of the former, it’s relatively easy to understand why making rules against their use would be beneficial, and welcomed in most cases. For schools, it’s akin to outlawing running in the hall. A time honored tradition that has set the speed limit in school hallways at around 4mph. For places like malls, it’s been likened to roller-blading or skateboarding, which can present numerous risks where groups of people gather.

However, in the case of the latter, to ban their use would be a blatant restriction of freedom in the name of safety. Or creating a Nanny-state, as some would call it. It takes responsibility away from the parents and the kids who wear these things. And I can only assume that this is what the question is actually asking, because it already notes in the article that many malls and schools have banned them.

After complaining about the injuries that her son sustained while using these rolling sneakers, Nancy Woelfel of Davidsonville, Maryland, said that other parents should know about the risks. As in, other parents should read the warnings that come with the shoe. Certainly that’s what she meant. I would just be plain cynical to assume that she was talking about anything else.

One of the shoe’s manufacturers, and the product’s adopted namesake, Heelys, has the safety gear warnings posted all over their website. They encourage the practice of ALWAYS using protective gear in statements similar to this one:

Important:
We always recommend that anyone who attempts to use HEELYS in any capacity should ALWAYS wear full protective gear, including: helmets, wrist, elbow, and knee pads. The video you are about to watch contains footage of highly skilled, trained, professional, adult skate team members, some of whom may not be wearing full gear. These should only be attempted by professionals. NEVER use HEELYS in an unsafe manner, and NEVER WITHOUT full protective gear. By clicking on the videos to view them, you understand and accept our warning.

But leave it to the mainstream media to play on the fear of injury and the penchant to shirk responsibility. I especially like how they added the note that, “some walkers find heelers who zip in and out of crowds a nuisance.” As if mere annoyance is enough to justify regulating the behavior of others.

Whatever is going on, it’s apparent that the warnings are not enough. Kids are getting injured for chrissakes!! Something has to be done! I know… let’s ban ‘em!

Circular Reasoning Works

Ramblings, Logic 1 Comment »

I’m not sure about anyone else, but I’ve always found it a mind-numbingly painful task to try and explain to (among others) a theist why or how circular reasoning is akin to the murder of original thought and incapable of providing a viable reason for acceptance.

I’ve spent mountains of time (through email or various forums) explaining it in detail to some people - pulling out fallacy references and all the logic you ever wanted to know about. And when that seemed to take like an Asian woman to a driver’s test, I tried simplifying it as best I could. While that helped, it still didn’t have the effect I had hoped for, which was, of course, complete and total submission to my superior reasoning.

Like any great thinker stifled by the myopia of his time, I feel the need to resort to illustrations. So from now on, instead of words, I will be using this:

Circular Reasoning

However, if experience has taught me anything, the irony will likely be lost on the intended audience.

Darwin was an Idiot

Ramblings, Quotes, General Idiocy 1 Comment »

“I see no good reasons why the views given in this volume should shock the religious sensibilities of anyone.”

- Charles Darwin, On the Origins of Species

;)

Close
E-mail It