Archive for the 'Atheism' Category

Belief… Within Reason

Religion, Atheism, Quotes, Philosophy 2 Comments »

“Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find anything that agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.”

- Siddhartha Gautama (The Buddha)

Conversations with Jesus

Religion, Atheism, Philosophy 35 Comments »

Welcome to Conversations with Jesus. In this fireside chat, we will be listening to a wonderful discussion between two of history’s most admired martyrs. Both tried, convicted, and sentenced to death, it is nothing short of remarkable that we are able to bring both of them here today for Conversations with Jesus. Without further adieu, I say ‘welcome’ to both of you…

Jesus meet Socrates… Socrates meet Jesus

Jesus Socrates

Socrates:
Good morning, Jesus, I have heard much of your marvelous teachings. In my own modest way I am a philosopher here in Athens. I am told you have great wisdom and certainly that is indicated by the throng of admirers that follow you through the streets. If you have a few moments to spare, I would appreciate it if you would enlighten me with the answers to some of the puzzling problems I have been wrestling with all my life

Jesus:
I am as a fisher of men in my search for followers. I bring the truth of God to all men. Seek and you shall find, ask and it shall be answered knock and it shall be open unto to thee.

Socrates:
There is one basic question that has always been uppermost in my mind. Although it has always been an insurmountable obstacle to me in my search for the truth and meaning, I am sure that with your learning you will find it far too easy and think me a foolish old man. I have always longed to live honorably and nobly, but it seems that I have merely stumbled through life without even knowing what was honorable or noble. With my limited understanding, it often seems to me that life, even with all its sound and fury, really signifies nothing. Please tell me: How should a man live; what is the purpose of life?

Jesus:
To serve and worship God.

Socrates:
Which God?

Jesus:
There is only one god.

Socrates:
Oh. You should live here in Athens. We have several to choose from.

Jesus:
There is only one true God.

Socrates:
Of course. And which one is the true God?

Jesus:
The true god is Lord God.

Socrates:
Yes. But who is Lord God? Or what is he?

Jesus:
He is the infinity of wisdom, love, compassion, peace, and mercy. He is the creator of heaven and earth all things in the universe.

Socrates:
Of all things?

Jesus:
Yes-all things. He is omnipotent. He is master and controller and maker of all things. He is omnipresent-nothing can happen that he does not know beforehand.

Socrates:
Did he create plagues, wars, death, suffering and evil?

Read the rest of this entry »

20/20 Story on Atheist Discrimination

Ramblings, Religion, Politics, Atheism 2 Comments »

As a person who once tried to play basketball in a high school in Oklahoma, I must say that this story from 20/20 hits a little close to home. The story is about an Atheist student, Nicole, in the town of Hardesty, Oklahoma, who allegedly experienced a few difficulties with other students and even teachers and administrators because of her (lack of) religious beliefs.

I must admit that, at her age, I didn’t have the strength or the confidence to do what she did by telling her coaches or other students that she was, in fact, an Atheist. I hadn’t even developed a full understanding of what it meant to be an Atheist, much less the ability to stand up for those beliefs in the way she did.

I was the one who found myself taking John Stossel’s suggestion… standing in that circle, before the game, silently waiting for those around me to finish their regurgitation of the Lord’s Prayer. A friend was the first to notice, and asked me about it. But things didn’t turn sour until an assistant coach noticed some time later. Much like Nicole, I was told that I wasn’t welcome if I wasn’t going to join the team in prayer.

Regardless of how badly I would like to say something to my coaches, to this day, I don’t regret my decision to leave the team after that. If they were going to be discriminatory, then it’s not a team I wanted to play with anyway. I played basketball more for fun than (like Nicole) in a pursuit of a college scholarship, and I was fortunate enough to have such a luxury.

I am both proud and sorry for Nicole and her situation. And I can only hope that her story will help chip away at the religion-fueled bigotry, discrimination, and hate that is so prevalent in this country.

A Brief History of Disbelief

Religion, Atheism 4 Comments »

Anything that has Christians all up in a tizzy in this country is bound to catch my eye. According to CNSNews.com, on May 4th PBS is going to begin airing a three part series on Atheism called A Brief History of Disbelief. Here’s the (very brief) preview…

Produced and narrated by Jonathan Miller, “this series is about the disappearance of something: religious faith.” It originally aired on the BBC in 2005, and an IPF page has been set up for the US airing.

Of course, the CNS News article includes all the standard fallacy-laden Christian attacks. One would think that if they truly believed that they had the absolute truth correct, then they wouldn’t be so insecure about opposing views. For example, I wonder what kind of fervor would be heard from the scientists if PBS aired a documentary that claimed Earth doesn’t exist. This absolute truth thing seems to be lost on these Christians. Hmmm, fodder for another post…

Check your local listings for times.

The Religious Office Card

Ramblings, Religion, Atheism 7 Comments »

This week I was confronted with a new situation - The Religious Office Card - and I wasn’t quite sure how to act. In our office (of 9 employees), we had a coworker, whose sister lost her husband the weekend before. Another person in the office thought it would be a nice gesture if we got a card to sign and send to the sister.

I’m not a particularly emotional person, so this seemed a little odd to me. Seeing as how nobody in the office was even so much as an acquaintance to the sister, it almost seemed a little patronizing.

When the card was first handed to me, I was debating whether or not to sign it at all, since I had never even heard of this person before her husband died. It just didn’t seem like I was in any position to be offering sincere sympathy to this woman. But then, I read the card. The text of the card read like this…

Outside:

God Grant You Peace

In This Time Of Sorrow

Inside:

May you find comfort in warm memories of the beautiful life that has passed. May you find peace in the assurance that an even more beautiful life has begun for your loved one.

With Deepest Sympathy

Well that complicated things a bit. Not only do I feel conflicted about writing in the card to this woman I’ve never met, regarding a subject so painful as the death of a spouse, but now I’m at odds with the message of the card, which is little more than utilitarian religious rhetoric.

Should I add my piece, which would be devoid of religious connotations? If so, what would I say? And how do I say it without coming across too strongly as against the idea of finding comfort in god/prayer/a more beautiful life after this one? Will saying something explicitly opposite of the card’s symbolism effectively out me to my coworkers? Is that a bad thing?

All these thoughts ran through my head in a matter of seconds. And to help answer some of my questions, I tried to get a feel for what my coworkers thought. Being the newest addition to this office, it’s possible that they knew more about her through our coworker than I did. So I read the messages they had written. These are the comments of the coworkers who had written in the card before it landed on my desk:

You are in my thoughts and prayers at this difficult time.

My prayer[s] are with you and your family.

May the Lord Bless and guide you though this difficult time. You are in our prayers.

I am so sorry for your loss. Please know that I am thinking of you & praying for you!

Oh great! Not a single one that doesn’t fall in lockstep with the card’s religious overtones.

I put the card aside and continued to work for a little bit while thinking about what I would say if I wrote anything. I had decided that if I couldn’t come up with anything good to say, then I would simply pass the card onto the next person.

I eventually arrived at the point where I wanted to write in the card… partly because, as an atheist, I felt challenged by those who had essentially called us out in the wake of the Virginia Tech terrorist massacre by saying atheism had nothing offer… and partly because, as a human being, I felt some level of empathy for this woman, and knew I had something to offer no matter how small or how devoid of religious expression. The difference a few words can make may be profound, no matter how insignificant they seem at the time they are written.

So I tried to think of something that would remind her of the influence of her husband’s life, and call on the strength that she had within herself without looking to someone else’s myth for comfort, while acknowledging the hole that his untimely death certainly left behind. After thinking on it for a few minutes, I began to write in the card. And this was my addition:

Samantha,

I cannot offer personal comfort or platitudes of prayer. As a stranger to you, I can only sincerely hope that your husband has left you with a positive indelible impression upon your life and who you are today, an impression for which you are eternally grateful, endowing you with the strength to go on through his life, and leaving you with little to regret through his death. My best regards!

I was left wishing that I could know her reaction, for I hope it was a positive one. I would be remiss if I didn’t acknowledge my own hope that my words, which required true thoughtfulness and originality, garnered a deeper and more sentient response than the expected and canned promises of prayers left by others.

What would you have done? Would you have written in the card? What would you have said?

A Wonderful Letter from Virginia Tech

Atheism 1 Comment »

I have refrained from weighing in on the Virginia Tech terrorist incident since everyone and their brother has been so busy blaming everyone else. And those that aren’t blaming are busy refuting the slanted and politically motivated (for shame) comments from the likes of Rush Limbaugh, various politicians, the Decider-in-Chief, and others.

A full list of who is to blame for the Virginia Tech terrorist shooting has been compiled at Cynical-C Blog. It’s updated as new people are faulted for Cho’s actions.

One of the most refuted idiots has been one Dinesh D’Souza, for his claim that Atheists are nowhere to be found in the wake of such a tragedy. Essentially Dinesh takes the opportunity - provided to him by the untimely deaths of 32 people in Virginia - to propose that Atheism isn’t right, doesn’t have anything to offer, and so on.

And the only reason I’m writing about it is because I came across a letter from a professor at Virginia Tech, who just so happens to be an Atheist. And I don’t think anyone has or could have said it more eloquently or correctly than it was said in this letter. So I have decided to reproduce it here, so anyone that might not come across it otherwise is aware of its existence.

The letter, an updated and final version, can be found here at Daily Kos. And so it goes…

I am an atheist and a professor at Virginia Tech. Dinesh D’Souza says that I don’t exist, that I have nothing to say, that I am nowhere to be found.

But I am here.

Mr D’Souza writes that according to atheists,

the main characteristic of the universe is pitiless indifference … What this tells me is that if it’s difficult to know where God is when bad things happen, it is even more difficult for atheism to deal with the problem of evil. The reason is that in a purely materialist universe, immaterial things like good and evil simply do not exist … Cho’s shooting of all those people can be understood in this way: molecules acting upon molecules.

I thought it worthwhile to say something in response, not because most people would put the point in the same morally reptilian manner as D’Souza, but because there is at least some vague sense amongst people that we atheists don’t quite grasp the enormity of Monday’s events, that we tend towards a cold-hearted manner of thinking, that we condescend to expressions of community, meaning, or bereavement.
So I will tell you, Mr D’Souza, what I grasp and where I am to be found.

I understand why my wife was frantic on Monday morning, trying to contact me through jammed phone lines. I can still feel the tenor of her voice resonating in my veins when she got through to me, how she shook with relief and tears. I remember how my mother looked the last time she thought she might have lost a son, so I have a vivid image of her and a thousand other mothers that hasn’t quite left my mind yet.

I am to be found in Lane Stadium, looking out over a sea of maroon and orange, trying not to break down when someone mentions the inviolability of the classroom and the bond between a teacher and his students. That is my classroom, Mr D’Souza, my students, my chosen responsibility in this godless life, my small office in the care of humanity and its youth.

I know that brutal death can come unannounced into any life, but that we should aspire to look at our approaching death with equanimity, with a sense that it completes a well-walked trail, that it is a privilege to have our stories run through to their proper end. I don’t need to live forever to live once and to live completely. It is precisely because I don’t believe there is an afterlife that I am so horrified by the stabbing and slashing and tattering of so many lives around me this week, the despoliation and ruination of the only thing each of us will ever have.

We atheists do not believe in gods, or angels, or demons, or souls that endure, or a meeting place after all is said and done where more can be said and done and the point of it all revealed. We don’t believe in the possibility of redemption after our lives, but the necessity of compassion in our lives. We believe in people, in their joys and pains, in their good ideas and their wit and wisdom. We believe in human rights and dignity, and we know what it is for those to be trampled on by brutes and vandals. We may believe that the universe is pitilessly indifferent but we know that friends and strangers alike most certainly are not. We despise atrocity, not because a god tells us that it is wrong, but because if not massacre then nothing could be wrong.

I am to be found on the drillfield with a candle in my hand. “Amazing Grace” is a beautiful song, and I can sing it for its beauty and its peacefulness. I don’t believe in any god, but I do believe in those people who have struggled through pain and found some solace in their religion. I am not at odds with them any more than I am at odds with Americans when we sing the “Star-Spangled Banner” just because I am not American.

I know that the theory of natural selection is the best explanation for the emergence and development of human beings and other species. I know that our bodies are composed of flesh, bone, and blood, and cells, and molecules. I also know that this does not account for all aspects of our lives, but I know no-one who ever thought it did. That is why we have science, and novels, and friendships, and poetry, and practical jokes, and photography, and a sense of awe at the immensity of time and the planet’s natural history, and walks with loved ones along the Huckleberry Trail, and atheist friends who keep kosher because, well just because, and passionate reverence for both those heroes who believed and those who did not, and have all this without needing a god to stitch together the tapestry of life.

I believe this young man was both sick and vicious, that his actions were both heinous and the result of a phenomenon that we must try to understand precisely so that we can prevent it in future. I have no sympathy for him. Given what he has done, I am not particularly sorry he has spared the world his continued existence; there was no possibility of redemption for him. You think we atheists have difficulty with the concept of evil. Quite the contrary. We can accept a description of this man as evil. We just don’t think that is an explanation. That is why we are exasperated at your mindless demonology.

Mr D’Souza writes that

atheism has nothing to offer in the face of tragedy except C’est la vie. Deal with it. Get over it. This is why the ceremonies were suffused with religious rhetoric. Only the language of religion seems appropriate to the magnitude of tragedy. Only God seems to have the power to heal hearts in such circumstances.

We think the pain is complete and absolute. We know it is.

We think that nothing can heal these hearts, that time can only take the sharpness off the agony, that only in time can beauty be wholeheartedly seen again or laughter felt deep inside.

We insist there is no sense or meaning to be made of this massacre. There was only sense and meaning to be created within the lives of each person gunned down. That is why we are horrified by it. That is precisely why it is so horrific.

We don’t believe these people have died for anything: God’s plan, as a beacon to the rest of us, to be a vivid memento mori for all. We just believe they have died, brutally and without mercy. We refuse to lie to grieving mothers out of some patronising sense that a pleasant myth is more respectful than a terrible truth.

Those of us with the slightest shred of decency do not tell widows to deal with it, to get over it. That the world can be callous is no reason to be so myself. I know that no family could ever get over this loss, that no family should ever be expected to get over this loss — either by themselves, by religious rhetoricians bearing false platitudes, or by inane political pundits — but that not getting over the loss does not preclude some other kind of happiness, some other source of joy, at some other time. Not now, not in this moment, not when they have moved on, but only when it comes to them one day, like light dawning slowly.

We know the world is cold, and that only people can make it warmer. We believe we can live in this imperfection, like a child can live without fulfilling her desperate wish for wings. We rail against injustice and tragedy, not the absence of deeper guarantees.

Some of us are those grieving mothers and wives and friends and colleagues. Some of us are inconsolable, but dignified for all that.

There is no language appropriate to the magnitude of the tragedy. Not stories about a poor man nailed to a cross, not fine words about a time for healing and a time for dying, not even the lines of the poet who, in the midst of his own horror, struggles to ask:

How can I embellish this carnival of slaughter, 
How decorate the massacre?

I feel humbled by the sense of composure of a family who lost someone on Monday. I will not insult that dignity by pretending there is sense to be made of this senselessness, or that there is some greater consolation to be found in the loss of a husband and son.

I know my students are now more than students.

You can find us next week in the bloodied classrooms of a violated campus, trying to piece our thoughts and lives and studies back together.

With or without a belief in a god, with or without your asinine bigotry, we will make progress, we will breathe life back into our university, I will succeed in explaining this or that point, slowly, eventually, in a ham-handed way, at risk of tears half-way through, my students will come to feel comfortable again in a classroom with no windows or escape route, and hell yes we will prevail.

You see Mr D’Souza, I am an atheist professor at Virginia Tech and a man of great faith. Not faith in your god. Faith in my people.

(A)theists Just Don’t Get It!

Religion, Atheism, Quotes No Comments »

“You believe in a book that has talking animals, wizards, witches, demons, sticks turning into snakes, burning bushes, food falling from the sky, people walking on water, and all sorts of magical, absurd and primitive stories, and you say we are the ones that need help?”

- Mark Twain

Christians Bash Atheists on CNN

Atheism, Media, General Idiocy 4 Comments »

This is absolutely unbelievable to me, but Paula Zahn has managed to do it again - allowing a gratuitously unchecked forum where Christians bash Atheists on CNN. The absolute unabashed bigotry is appalling. The hypocrisy seems to escape these folks.

Note: This video is from the January 31, 2007 edition of Paula Zahn Now, but I felt compelled, however belated, to comment on it anyway.

Notice how the video starts off? Paula Zahn says:

We’re talking about whether there is widespread discrimination against Atheists, folks who don’t believe in God.

She then proceeds to introduce her panel for this “discussion” which includes (wait for it…) three theists! Only one of whom, manages to mildly defend freedom of speech and civil liberties, but makes sure to profess his loyalty to his all-powerful authority figure before doing so.

Karen Hunter begins the discussion by questioning what more atheists could want:

Are we gonna take “In God We Trust” off of our dollars? Are we not gonna say “One nation under God”? When does it end? You know, We took prayer out of schools, what more do they want?

Now, normally, you would expect and unbiased journalist like Paula Zahn ( ;) ) to correct her panel with the facts. She doesn’t have to present the Atheist point of view, only the facts. You know, like the fact that prayer has not been removed from schools, but forced state-sanctioned prayer has been declared unconstitutional. Karen seems to want to pose the question as if the apparent ridiculousness in her tone is enough to dismiss the entire subject. Not only that, but she acts like Christians did someone a favor by taking “prayer out of schools”. Nevermind the Constitution, the Atheists should be happy that we went along on that one.

Then Debbie Schlussel chimes in with her turn at the misinformation machine:

I think that, um, the real discrimination is Atheists against Americans who are religious. Listen, we are a Christian Nation.

Apparently this “attorney” is not familiar with Article 11 of the unanimously approved Treaty of Tripoli. Instead, she notes that she’s Jewish, as if to attempt to point out her objectivity on the subject, and goes on to posit that we are a Christian nation because there are a lot of Christians here.

She also manages to point out that:

Freedom of religion doesn’t mean freedom from religion

Well, I’ll be. Perhaps if she weren’t adhering to a inadequate and incomplete conventional wisdom interpretation of the establishment clause in the Constitution she might understand why her comment is flat out wrong.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion

Notice that it doesn’t say “a religion”, it says “establishment of religion”. For it is inherent in the idea of freedom of religion that freedom from it must also be required. Otherwise you must choose which religion it’s going to be that gets to inhibit that freedom. Schlussel, obviously, thinks Christianity should be the religion that gets to restrict that freedom.

Moreover, forcing people to accept some particular idea or adhere to behavioral standards from someone else’s religion means that their religious freedom is being infringed upon. In other words, to put it so bluntly so someone as dim as Schlussel can understand it, freedom of religion, by definition, means freedom from Christianity. And the same goes for every single other religion present in the world. See? I’m not just picking on (or discriminating against) the Christians.

Stephen A. Smith, a sports analyst for ESPN (why is he there?), manages to interject a thin slice of rationality into the discussion, immediately after professing his love for his lord, by pointing out that you’re entitled to believe what you want as long as you’re not imposing those beliefs on other people.

But not to be outdone, Karen points out that the Atheists’ problem is marketing, and perhaps Atheists should adopt the Christian strategy of feeding off American consumerism to get their “message” out:
Read the rest of this entry »

Atheism Sucks

Religion, Atheism, General Idiocy 8 Comments »

…apparently.

I happened across a post by one Frank Walton on his blog, Atheism Sucks. I found the link to his blog on the Passionate Atheist. The post, entitled “TXAtheist won’t share the burden of proof”, by Frank is an email exchange between himself and an atheist, in which Frank tries to argue that a god exists based on “the impossibility of the contrary”. And tries to get the atheist to make the same kind of argument for his opposing position.

As any of you intelligent beings might recognize, such an argument is a fallacy of ignorance. I was interested in how Frank would reconcile this problem within his argument against the atheist, so I read on.

I ended up responding to his post by leaving a comment, under the username ccannizz11. I don’t want to link to his blog, but feel free to get there through the Passionate Atheist link on his sidebar. The exchange is currently posted in the comments section, however, all my comments must be approved by the owner, so I’ll be tracking the exchange in a separate post and will make it known if Frank doesn’t follow through.

Also, I would encourage you to respond, if you have the time.

UPDATE:
Awww, maaan, Frank quitted. :sad:

I’m going to post his final comments here, so everyone may witness the idiocy without going to his blog. My responses to his previous arguments are in bold, while his responses are blockquoted, and I have added a few comments in italics. The rest of the exchange is available on his blog. Not riveting stuff, but enjoy…
Read the rest of this entry »

The Atheist Blogroll

Ramblings, Atheism No Comments »

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!

I am now a proud part of The Atheist Blogroll. You can see the 25 most recently updated blogs in the rolling blogroll on the right side of this page. The full blogroll is now over 200 blogs, and growing.

It’s nice to see a growing community of freethinkers willing to speak out for freedom from religion.

Close
E-mail It