Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right
Ramblings, Politics September 6th. 2007, 10:27amThe proof… courtesy of the (former) mayor of Crestwood, IL…
This is probably related to my last post, if you’re paying attention. It’s also kind of ironic considering Mr. Stranczek is the son of Polish immigrants, and didn’t speak a word of English until he was 8 years old. Apparently the implicit need to learn the English language isn’t as strong as it was when he was a kid, so a persuasion of the more explicit variety is required these days… like an artificial designation of English as “our language”.
Of course this is perfectly in line with the tried and true New American Century Republican party line - ‘Let the market/individuals decide, unless we don’t like which way the market is going, then government will take care of it’. You know, like when “the market” wouldn’t choose Halliburton to build their outhouses, much less an entire country’s infrastructure.
But what the hell am I talking about? The dubious sign isn’t about war or government or no bid contracts. To go down that path requires entirely too much nuance and, oh, what do they call it, critical thinking. The sign is about immigrants, damnit! You know, those people who come here and siphon our tax dollars through welfare and public education systems, and don’t contribute anything, except direct evidence that Reaganomics doesn’t work because it creates the incentive for businesses to provide jobs to the people who are willing to accept the lowest standard of living (thus widening “the gap“).
But I digress. This sign isn’t necessarily about immigration itself. It’s about language. More specifically, it’s about the inherent annoyance of people speaking a language that you do not know. I’m sure if the unfamiliar language that was being spoken in this country most predominately was Polish instead of Spanish, then Chester wouldn’t have as much of a problem with it. But really, beyond the feeling of insecurity and the almost unavoidable suspicion that they are talking about you (you conceited bastard), what’s the problem with people speaking a language that you do not?
The answer is “nothing”… that is, until someone becomes so attached and possessive of their language that they expect everyone to cater to them by either 1) speaking their language or 2) finding someone who can translate in lieu of learning. Seeing as how we are supposed to be a free country and as a result government doesn’t declare an official language. Those two characteristics create an interesting juxtaposition.
The problem is that people like Chester see it as a one way street when there is nothing but their righteous indignation to suggest that it is.


September 8th, 2007 at 3:24 am
As far as the intent of the sign is concerned (leaving out the ironic spelling mistake), the people that would most be needing to learn English wouldn’t be able to read the sign (in English) instructing them to learn English…
September 10th, 2007 at 9:21 am
I’m glad somebody picked up on that. It’s almost the exact same comment I left on the StumbleUpon page where I found the image. I wanted to include it in the post, but it made it way too long.
Thanks Terry!
Also, in the post, I didn’t make it a point to mention the irony of the spelling error. From what I hear, I thought it was more obvious than it actually is.
October 2nd, 2007 at 3:17 pm
Just wanted to point out.. I went to a foreign country (Japan) for a month. I speak the language (basic level) but at no time did anyone ever tell me to “Speak Japanese or get out.” which one would think would be much more likely in a homogeneous country like Japan than in an “all-inclusive” country like America. In Phily (close to where I live) there are even signs in sub shops telling people to “order in English”. How insulting, unnecessary, and confrontational (as well as stupid).
November 19th, 2007 at 1:31 pm
English is our language? Isn’t English the language of the English?
June 4th, 2008 at 10:54 am
Aside from the obvious ’seperation of church and state issues’ was Crestwoods Mayor Robert Stranczek, who pointed out that he was ‘a life long Catholic’ embarrased when his police department jailed an innocent mother who was donating to the Salvation Army in December 2007 at the Walmart in Crestwood? Was Mayor Stranczek embarrassed when his police terrified those little girls at the Walmart that night? As a life long Catholic, was Mayor Stranczek embarrassed that his police department tore apart an innocent family for no reason?
He could have used that sign to apologize to the Treffly Coyne family.
Mayor Stranczek, as a life long Catholic I can say that with your handling of your police department and what happened to that family at the Walmart last year…
I am embarrassed to have you as a member of my church.
My church stands for the family.
David Bryant wrote:
Was Mayor Stanczek Embarrassed by the actions of Catholic Priest having sexual intercourse with young boys? Just wondering!!!
Under the Stranzcek administraton (his fathers) two young boys were molested by the Crestwood Police departments juvenile officer… that officer had been charged with this offense BEFORE HE BECAME THE JUVENILE OFFICER FOR THE CRESTWOOD POLICE.
Mayor Stranczek is a spineless politician who should look at himself before he casts the first stone…
His father made some disturbing comments as mayor…
“In one case, former Crestwood Mayor Chester Stranczek tried to use his political influence to get his town drawn into another congressional district, saying he did not believe someone with Rush’s background could adequately represent the ideas of the white ethnics who live there.”
If Mayor Stranczek thought a black man couldn’t represent the “white’s” of Crestwood… what’s he gonna do when Barack Obama becomes the next President?
Good job Mayor Slimeczek